From: "Natalie Protasevich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:49:12 -0800
> Possible reason for this failure was identified and tested by the > submitter and several other reporters that ran into the same problem. > Can the patch be reviewed and pushed upstream if accepted (if the > problem hasn't been addressed already)? There are a lot of bogus patches in there, using funny long variable names, and mainly they were meant for testing and verification of the problem. I see no real serious patch submissions in that bug and furthermore the patch, if ready, should be submitted formally here to netdev not rot in bugzilla. Finally, what appears to be the proposal cannot be correct. If the fib6_add_rt2node() finds that the new route is a duplicate, we should disconnect it from the fn->leaf and do a dst_release(). The bug appears to be rather that we leave the route attached to the fn, not that we drop the refrence to it. Thank you. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
