On 4/10/15 7:03 PM, Jonathan Toppins wrote:
Three of the supported PCI device entries neglected to set driver data to "board_82575". This is not a problem until a new board type is defined, so avoid the potential problem all together.Signed-off-by: Jonathan Toppins <jtopp...@cumulusnetworks.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c index 8457d03..bb467bb 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c @@ -73,9 +73,9 @@ static const struct e1000_info *igb_info_tbl[] = { }; static const struct pci_device_id igb_pci_tbl[] = { - { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, E1000_DEV_ID_I354_BACKPLANE_1GBPS) }, - { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, E1000_DEV_ID_I354_SGMII) }, - { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, E1000_DEV_ID_I354_BACKPLANE_2_5GBPS) }, + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, E1000_DEV_ID_I354_BACKPLANE_1GBPS), board_82575 }, + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, E1000_DEV_ID_I354_SGMII), board_82575 }, + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, E1000_DEV_ID_I354_BACKPLANE_2_5GBPS), board_82575 }, { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, E1000_DEV_ID_I211_COPPER), board_82575 }, { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, E1000_DEV_ID_I210_COPPER), board_82575 }, { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, E1000_DEV_ID_I210_FIBER), board_82575 },
Simple keepalive to make sure these have not been forgotten, the patchworks entries are still in "new" state.
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/460268/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/460270/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/460269/ Regards, -Jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
