On Tue, 2015-04-28 at 15:56 -0700, Yuchung Cheng wrote:

> Acked-by: Yuchung Cheng <ych...@google.com>
> 

Thanks !

> tho I slightly prefer to call tcp_rcv_nxt_update() when rcv_nxt is
> updated in TFO for consistency.

Right, but is the tp->rcv_nxt prior value even valid at this point ? :)

Anyway, this would need to make tcp_rcv_nxt_update() non static and
would convince compiler to not inline the code.

At this point, we can simply set tp->bytes_received.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to