From: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebni...@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 16:56:18 +0300

> Unlike to inetaddr_chain inet6addr_chain is atomic and called from bh
> context without rtnl when ipv6 receives router advertisement packet.
> 
> Several drivers don't know about that: ipvlan thinks that it has rtnl
> here, ocrdma locks mutex inside callback. Probably there is more.
> 
> This patch makes it blocking and calls from first stage of DAD work.
> Looks like this is completely safe and rtnl already locked here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebni...@yandex-team.ru>

I don't see how you can make the inet6addr_chain blocking when it is
invoked from software interrupt context.

You also cannot try to defer these operations to a workqueue or
similar to get into a blockable context, because various ipv6
testsuites depend upon the addressing state change happening
when we process the packet that triggers that change.

Instead, I think you have to make the users of inet6addr_chain
aware of the context in which they execute.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to