Thanks Eric. I will give this a spin. The issue doesnt happen all the
time, I can keep the server running with this patch for a while and
observe if the issue resurfaces or not

Rgds,
Gopa.

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 6:45 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 06:33 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>> The problem is in linux code itself. Please try the patch I sent ?
>> (On the client)
>
> On the server, sorry for the typo.
>
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
>> index 
>> df7fe3c31162e77b96f81399ef7d893485ab3d91..70db6572d241e132c28c381dfc1155b150c9557b
>>  100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c
>> @@ -588,6 +588,9 @@ struct sock *tcp_check_req(struct sock *sk, struct 
>> sk_buff *skb,
>>       if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq == tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn &&
>>           flg == TCP_FLAG_SYN &&
>>           !paws_reject) {
>> +             if (tmp_opt.saw_tstamp &&
>> +                 after(tmp_opt.rcv_tsval, req->ts_recent))
>> +                     req->ts_recent = tmp_opt.rcv_tsval;
>>               /*
>>                * RFC793 draws (Incorrectly! It was fixed in RFC1122)
>>                * this case on figure 6 and figure 8, but formal
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to