On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Sorin Dumitru <so...@returnze.ro> wrote:
> We're seeing some softlockups from this function when there
> are a lot fdb entries on a vxlan device. Taking the lock for
> each bucket instead of the whole table is enough to fix that.
>

Hmm, then the spinlock could be moved into each bucket, right?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to