On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 04:22:36PM +0300, Haggai Eran wrote: > wouldn't care if they share the "QP number namespace", etc. RDMA CM > ports are different because they are chosen by the applications, but > they map directly to the network namespace, so they don't require their > own namespace.
Different containers should have restricted access to the PKey and GID tables, and the presence device itself. Just like in the SRIOV case. That is what the 'RDMA Namespace' would control. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
