On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 02:56:25PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> > Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 07:12:37 -0700 > > > Can we ensure offload_base contains a sensible order of expected > > types ? > > This seemed easy enough to kill, so I pushed the following into net-next: > > ==================== > [PATCH] net: Add priority to packet_offload objects. > > When we scan a packet for GRO processing, we want to see the most > common packet types in the front of the offload_base list. > > So add a priority field so we can handle this properly. > > IPv4/IPv6 get the highest priority with the implicit zero priority > field. > > Next comes ethernet with a priority of 10, and then we have the MPLS > types with a priority of 15.
FWIW I have no objections to the priority assigned to MPLS. > Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> > Suggested-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshi...@lab.ntt.co.jp> > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
