From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leit...@gmail.com>
That's needed for the next patch, so we break the lock inversion between
netns_sctp->addr_wq_lock and socket lock on
sctp_addr_wq_timeout_handler(). With this, we can traverse addr_waitq
without taking addr_wq_lock, taking it just for the write operations.
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leit...@gmail.com>
---
Notes:
v2->v3:
placed break statement on sctp_free_addr_wq_entry()
removed unnecessary spin_lock noticed by Neil
include/net/netns/sctp.h | 2 +-
net/sctp/protocol.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/netns/sctp.h b/include/net/netns/sctp.h
index
3573a81815ad9e0efb6ceb721eb066d3726419f0..9e53412c4ed829e8e45777a6d95406d490dbaa75
100644
--- a/include/net/netns/sctp.h
+++ b/include/net/netns/sctp.h
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ struct netns_sctp {
* It is a list of sctp_sockaddr_entry.
*/
struct list_head local_addr_list;
- struct list_head addr_waitq;
+ struct list_head __rcu addr_waitq;
struct timer_list addr_wq_timer;
struct list_head auto_asconf_splist;
spinlock_t addr_wq_lock;
diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c
index
53b7acde9aa37bf3d4029c459421564d5270f4c0..9954fb8c9a9455d5ad7a627e2d7f9a1fef861fc2
100644
--- a/net/sctp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
@@ -593,15 +593,47 @@ static void sctp_v4_ecn_capable(struct sock *sk)
INET_ECN_xmit(sk);
}
+static void sctp_free_addr_wq(struct net *net)
+{
+ struct sctp_sockaddr_entry *addrw;
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock);
+ del_timer(&net->sctp.addr_wq_timer);
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(addrw, &net->sctp.addr_waitq, list) {
+ list_del_rcu(&addrw->list);
+ kfree_rcu(addrw, rcu);
+ }
+ spin_unlock_bh(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock);
+}
+
+/* As there is no refcnt on sctp_sockaddr_entry, we must check inside
+ * the lock if it wasn't removed from addr_waitq already, otherwise we
+ * could double-free it.
+ */
+static void sctp_free_addr_wq_entry(struct net *net,
+ struct sctp_sockaddr_entry *addrw)
+{
+ struct sctp_sockaddr_entry *temp;
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(temp, &net->sctp.addr_waitq, list) {
+ if (temp == addrw) {
+ list_del_rcu(&addrw->list);
+ kfree_rcu(addrw, rcu);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ spin_unlock_bh(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock);
+}
+
static void sctp_addr_wq_timeout_handler(unsigned long arg)
{
struct net *net = (struct net *)arg;
- struct sctp_sockaddr_entry *addrw, *temp;
+ struct sctp_sockaddr_entry *addrw;
struct sctp_sock *sp;
- spin_lock_bh(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock);
-
- list_for_each_entry_safe(addrw, temp, &net->sctp.addr_waitq, list) {
+ rcu_read_lock_bh();
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(addrw, &net->sctp.addr_waitq, list) {
pr_debug("%s: the first ent in wq:%p is addr:%pISc for cmd:%d
at "
"entry:%p\n", __func__, &net->sctp.addr_waitq,
&addrw->a.sa,
addrw->state, addrw);
@@ -647,35 +679,20 @@ static void sctp_addr_wq_timeout_handler(unsigned long
arg)
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
free_next:
#endif
- list_del(&addrw->list);
- kfree(addrw);
- }
- spin_unlock_bh(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock);
-}
-
-static void sctp_free_addr_wq(struct net *net)
-{
- struct sctp_sockaddr_entry *addrw;
- struct sctp_sockaddr_entry *temp;
-
- spin_lock_bh(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock);
- del_timer(&net->sctp.addr_wq_timer);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(addrw, temp, &net->sctp.addr_waitq, list) {
- list_del(&addrw->list);
- kfree(addrw);
+ sctp_free_addr_wq_entry(net, addrw);
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock_bh();
}
/* lookup the entry for the same address in the addr_waitq
- * sctp_addr_wq MUST be locked
+ * rcu read MUST be locked
*/
static struct sctp_sockaddr_entry *sctp_addr_wq_lookup(struct net *net,
struct sctp_sockaddr_entry *addr)
{
struct sctp_sockaddr_entry *addrw;
- list_for_each_entry(addrw, &net->sctp.addr_waitq, list) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(addrw, &net->sctp.addr_waitq, list) {
if (addrw->a.sa.sa_family != addr->a.sa.sa_family)
continue;
if (addrw->a.sa.sa_family == AF_INET) {
@@ -702,7 +719,7 @@ void sctp_addr_wq_mgmt(struct net *net, struct
sctp_sockaddr_entry *addr, int cm
* new address after a couple of addition and deletion of that address
*/
- spin_lock_bh(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock);
+ rcu_read_lock_bh();
/* Offsets existing events in addr_wq */
addrw = sctp_addr_wq_lookup(net, addr);
if (addrw) {
@@ -710,22 +727,21 @@ void sctp_addr_wq_mgmt(struct net *net, struct
sctp_sockaddr_entry *addr, int cm
pr_debug("%s: offsets existing entry for %d, addr:%pISc
"
"in wq:%p\n", __func__, addrw->state,
&addrw->a.sa,
&net->sctp.addr_waitq);
-
- list_del(&addrw->list);
- kfree(addrw);
+ sctp_free_addr_wq_entry(net, addrw);
}
- spin_unlock_bh(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock_bh();
return;
}
+ rcu_read_unlock_bh();
/* OK, we have to add the new address to the wait queue */
addrw = kmemdup(addr, sizeof(struct sctp_sockaddr_entry), GFP_ATOMIC);
- if (addrw == NULL) {
- spin_unlock_bh(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock);
+ if (!addrw)
return;
- }
addrw->state = cmd;
- list_add_tail(&addrw->list, &net->sctp.addr_waitq);
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&net->sctp.addr_wq_lock);
+ list_add_tail_rcu(&addrw->list, &net->sctp.addr_waitq);
pr_debug("%s: add new entry for cmd:%d, addr:%pISc in wq:%p\n",
__func__, addrw->state, &addrw->a.sa, &net->sctp.addr_waitq);
--
2.4.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
