On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 01:31:31PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 09/06/15 12:22, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:54:50AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am observing a strange problem on net-next (not observed with net,
> >> bisection in progress) where the initial DHCP configuration using
> >> busybox's udhcpc is able to configure the local interface address and
> >> DNS serer, but not the default gateway. Restarting udhcpc a second time
> >> does not exhibit this problem.
> >
> > Hi Florian
> >
> > I've seen something similar, but different, again with DSA involved,
> > on a WiFi Access point. I have debian, and i'm using isc dhcp. It gets
> > an address, sets the address on the interface, but does not add the
> > interface route to the routing table. Not sure about default route, i
> > would have to go check that.
>
> Interesting, did you also observe this with 'net', or just with 'net-next'?
Just net-next, for some value of net-next. But i've not used net much,
since i see this problem during developing new features.
> Contrary to what I reported above, this is only an issue with
> SYSTEMPORT/DSA/SF2, I could not reproduce this GENET or the Asix driver,
> Note that I am observing this on ARM (Andrew probably is as well),
Yep.
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
