On 6/10/15 2:56 PM, sfel...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Scott Feldman <sfel...@gmail.com>

Fix a BUG() where CONFIG_NET_SWITCHDEV is set but the driver for a bridged
port does not support switchdec_port_attr_set op.  Don't BUG() if
-EOPNOTSUPP is returned.

Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfel...@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Brenden Blanco <bbla...@plumgrid.com>
---
  net/switchdev/switchdev.c |    2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
index e008057..99bced4 100644
--- a/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
+++ b/net/switchdev/switchdev.c
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static void switchdev_port_attr_set_work(struct work_struct 
*work)

        rtnl_lock();
        err = switchdev_port_attr_set(asw->dev, &asw->attr);
-       BUG_ON(err);
+       BUG_ON(err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP);
        rtnl_unlock();

        dev_put(asw->dev);


Should that be WARN_ON instead of BUG_ON?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to