In commit 'c03abd84634d ("net: ethernet: cpsw: don't requests
IRQs we don't use")', common isr is split into tx and rx, but
in rx isr tx interrupt is also disabledi in cpsw_disable_irq().
So tx interrupts are not handled during rx interrupts and rx
napi completion and results in poor tx performance by 40Mbps.
Fixing by disabling only rx interrupt in rx isr.

Cc: Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com>
Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org> # v4.0+
Signed-off-by: Mugunthan V N <mugunthan...@ti.com>
---

Changes from initial version:
* Modified only the commit message as commented by Balbi it is
  not a regression and the patch improves tx performance

---

 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 19 +++----------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
index e778703..f335bf1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
@@ -138,19 +138,6 @@ do {                                                       
        \
 #define CPSW_CMINTMAX_INTVL    (1000 / CPSW_CMINTMIN_CNT)
 #define CPSW_CMINTMIN_INTVL    ((1000 / CPSW_CMINTMAX_CNT) + 1)
 
-#define cpsw_enable_irq(priv)  \
-       do {                    \
-               u32 i;          \
-               for (i = 0; i < priv->num_irqs; i++) \
-                       enable_irq(priv->irqs_table[i]); \
-       } while (0)
-#define cpsw_disable_irq(priv) \
-       do {                    \
-               u32 i;          \
-               for (i = 0; i < priv->num_irqs; i++) \
-                       disable_irq_nosync(priv->irqs_table[i]); \
-       } while (0)
-
 #define cpsw_slave_index(priv)                         \
                ((priv->data.dual_emac) ? priv->emac_port :     \
                priv->data.active_slave)
@@ -783,7 +770,7 @@ static irqreturn_t cpsw_rx_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
 
        cpsw_intr_disable(priv);
        if (priv->irq_enabled == true) {
-               cpsw_disable_irq(priv);
+               disable_irq_nosync(priv->irqs_table[0]);
                priv->irq_enabled = false;
        }
 
@@ -819,7 +806,7 @@ static int cpsw_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
                prim_cpsw = cpsw_get_slave_priv(priv, 0);
                if (prim_cpsw->irq_enabled == false) {
                        prim_cpsw->irq_enabled = true;
-                       cpsw_enable_irq(priv);
+                       enable_irq(priv->irqs_table[0]);
                }
        }
 
@@ -1335,7 +1322,7 @@ static int cpsw_ndo_open(struct net_device *ndev)
        if (prim_cpsw->irq_enabled == false) {
                if ((priv == prim_cpsw) || !netif_running(prim_cpsw->ndev)) {
                        prim_cpsw->irq_enabled = true;
-                       cpsw_enable_irq(prim_cpsw);
+                       enable_irq(prim_cpsw->irqs_table[0]);
                }
        }
 
-- 
2.5.0.rc0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to