On 07/09/2015 05:28 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 05:21:10PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 17:14 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> If I checkout iproute2 tree to db08bdb816d337102c5486744008db9c9faa43bf
>>> (before buggy commit) we indeed had this result :
>>>
>>> # ./ss -an | grep 127.0.0.1
>>> raw UNCONN 213486 0 127.0.0.1:6 *:*
>>>
>>
>> Maybe following patch would fix the issue.
>>
>> diff --git a/misc/ss.c b/misc/ss.c
>> index 03f92fa69270..9b7dad00290c 100644
>> --- a/misc/ss.c
>> +++ b/misc/ss.c
>> @@ -1552,6 +1552,8 @@ out:
>> static char *proto_name(int protocol)
>> {
>> switch (protocol) {
>> + case 0:
>> + return "raw";
>> case IPPROTO_UDP:
>> return "udp";
>> case IPPROTO_TCP:
>> @@ -2416,7 +2418,7 @@ static int dgram_show_line(char *line, const struct
>> filter *f, int family)
>> if (n < 9)
>> opt[0] = 0;
>>
>> - inet_stats_print(&s, IPPROTO_UDP);
>> + inet_stats_print(&s, 0);
>>
>> if (show_details && opt[0])
>> printf(" opt:\"%s\"", opt);
>>
>>
>
> Yes, it fixes the issue too.
Yeah, I think this is better than my solution because it's not really
IPPROTO_RAW protocol, so I'll drop my submission.
Thanks,
Nik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
