On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 11:54:47AM +0300, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > > I don't think that recv path should care about shared skb -- skb can be > delivered into only one socket anyway.
The fact is that this is how the original code worked and was expected to do. The broadcast side would generate a shared skb and the recv side is supposed to only read it, not modify it. In fact apart from the skb->peeked bug netlink_recvmsg does all the right things and never modifies skb. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
