On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Sowmini Varadhan
<sowmini.varad...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> I'm running into a netns refcnt issue, and I suspect that
> eeb1bd5c has something to do with it (perhaps we need an
> additional change in sk_clone_lock() after eeb1bd5c).
> Here's the problem:
>
> When we create an syn_recv sock based on a kernel listen sock, we
> take a get_net() ref  with a stack similar to the one shown below.
> Note that the parent (kernel, listen) sock itself has not taken
> a get_net() ref, because it explicitly calls sock_create_kern().
>
>   get_net /* for the newsk */
>   sk_clone_lock
>   inet_csk_clone_lock
>   tcp_create_openreq_child
>   tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock
>   tcp_check_req
>   tcp_v4_do_rcv
>   tcp_v4_rcv
>    :
>
> But it's not clear to me where this refcnt will be released:
> in my case, I expect to create/cleanup kernel sockets as part
> of ->init/->exit for my module, but because the accept socket
> has a netns refcnt, it blocks cleanup_net(), thus my ->exit
> pernet_subsys op cannot run and clean this up, and we have a leak.


That refcnt should be released in sock destructor too, when the tcp
connection is terminated.

>
> I think that sk_clone_lock() should only do a get_net() if the parent
> is not a kernel socket (making this similar to sk_alloc()), i.e.,
>

Given the fact that sk_destruct() checks for sk_net_refcnt, your
patch makes sense to me. But I am not sure how a TCP kernel
socket is supposed to use.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to