On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Jason Gunthorpe <jguntho...@obsidianresearch.com> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 12:24:23AM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote: > >> addressed in incremental patch, as Doug suggested. Jason, it's wrong >> to send developers again and again to fix things which were >> perfect in Vn-1 but also not being covered by reviewers on Vn-1, at >> some point the reviewer can't load new comments which gate the > > I don't even know what you are talking about Or. > > v6 had some small problems in the logic and v7 introduces a fairly > serious flaw while trying to fix them. IMHO, you are better to merge > v6 than v7, at least v6's problems are less likely to be serious.
Jason, can you be more specific? I don't see any comments from you expect for the cover-letter, so if something broke out, sure, a fix is needed, but what is that? > That is the same argument you used for the timestamp _ex UAPI mess, > last cycle, where are the incremental fixes for that? I remember you have provided review comment which pointed that the time-stamping series stepped on something which was there before needs some cleanup, not a real mess to my taste. Matan, do have the plan to do that work? Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
