On 8/4/15 1:58 AM, Kaixu Xia wrote:
+static int check_func_limit(struct bpf_map **mapp, int func_id)
how about 'check_map_func_compatibility' or 'check_map_func_affinity' ?
+{
+ struct bpf_map *map = *mapp;
why pass pointer to a pointer? single pointer would be be fine.
+ bool bool_map, bool_func;
+ int i;
+
+ if (!map)
+ return 0;
+
+ for (i = 0; i <= ARRAY_SIZE(func_limit); i++) {
+ bool_map = (map->map_type == func_limit[i].map_type);
+ bool_func = (func_id == func_limit[i].func_id);
+ /* only when map & func pair match it can continue.
+ * don't allow any other map type to be passed into
+ * the special func;
+ */
+ if (bool_map != bool_func)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
nice simplification!
the rest of the changes look good.
please respin your next set against net-next.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
