From: Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:07:34 -0700

> From: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
> 
> In commit b357a364c57c9 ("inet: fix possible panic in
> reqsk_queue_unlink()"), I missed fact that tcp_check_req()
> can return the listener socket in one case, and that we must
> release the request socket refcount or we leak it.
> 
> Tested:
> 
>  Following packetdrill test template shows the issue
> 
> 0     socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
> +0    setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
> +0    bind(3, ..., ...) = 0
> +0    listen(3, 1) = 0
> 
> +0    < S 0:0(0) win 2920 <mss 1460,sackOK,nop,nop>
> +0    > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK>
> +.002 < . 1:1(0) ack 21 win 2920
> +0    > R 21:21(0)
> 
> Fixes: b357a364c57c9 ("inet: fix possible panic in reqsk_queue_unlink()")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>

Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to