On 8/18/15 10:03 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:

+/* unconnected socket. If output device is enslaved to a VRF
+ * device lookup source address from VRF table.
+ */
+static void udp_sendmsg_vrf_saddr(struct net *net, struct flowi4 *fl4,
+                                  int oif, struct sock *sk)
+{
+       if (netif_index_is_vrf(net, oif)) {
+               __u8 flow_flags = fl4->flowi4_flags;
+               struct rtable *rt;
+
+               fl4->flowi4_flags = flow_flags | FLOWI_FLAG_VRFSRC;
+               rt = ip_route_output_flow(net, fl4, sk);
+               if (!IS_ERR(rt))
+                       ip_rt_put(rt);

This looks buggy. What happened to saddr = fl4->saddr; ?

Not needed.


+               fl4->flowi4_flags = flow_flags;
+       }
+}
+
  int udp_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
  {
        struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk);
@@ -1013,33 +1033,16 @@ int udp_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, 
size_t len)

        if (!rt) {
                struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
-               __u8 flow_flags = inet_sk_flowi_flags(sk);

                fl4 = &fl4_stack;

-               /* unconnected socket. If output device is enslaved to a VRF
-                * device lookup source address from VRF table. This mimics
-                * behavior of ip_route_connect{_init}.
-                */
-               if (netif_index_is_vrf(net, ipc.oif)) {
-                       flowi4_init_output(fl4, ipc.oif, sk->sk_mark, tos,
-                                          RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE, sk->sk_protocol,
-                                          (flow_flags | FLOWI_FLAG_VRFSRC),
-                                          faddr, saddr, dport,
-                                          inet->inet_sport);
-
-                       rt = ip_route_output_flow(net, fl4, sk);
-                       if (!IS_ERR(rt)) {
-                               saddr = fl4->saddr;
-                               ip_rt_put(rt);
-                       }
-               }
-
                flowi4_init_output(fl4, ipc.oif, sk->sk_mark, tos,
                                   RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE, sk->sk_protocol,
-                                  flow_flags,
+                                  inet_sk_flowi_flags(sk),
                                   faddr, saddr, dport, inet->inet_sport);

+               udp_sendmsg_vrf_saddr(net, fl4, ipc.oif, sk);
+

fl4->saddr gets set in udp_sendmsg_vrf_saddr, stays for the next two...

                security_sk_classify_flow(sk, flowi4_to_flowi(fl4));
                rt = ip_route_output_flow(net, fl4, sk);
                if (IS_ERR(rt)) {


and then right after the above block you have:


        if (msg->msg_flags&MSG_CONFIRM)
                goto do_confirm;
back_from_confirm:

        saddr = fl4->saddr;

So in short the original code change did not need the 'saddr = fl4->saddr;'.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to