> > In addition to what David said and looking at it from a different angle... > 256 buckets > may not be enough for someone with a single endpoint and alot of > associations. You > will still hit a long chain on INIT and COOKIE-ECHO chunks. > > Switching to using rhashtable for association hash would be very nice. > good idea, I will think about it.
> Also, see if you can split this into 2 parts, one that does vtag hash and > the other is refactoring. It would make it much easier to review. > I tried, it's kind of hard, cause i do not add the vtag hashtable, but change the original hashtable to vtag hashtable, which make sendmsg lost its hashtable. I have to add another one for per endpoint. anyway, I will try to split it again, thanks. > -vlad > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
