On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 09:14:42AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2015-09-09 at 15:14 +0200, LABBE Corentin wrote: > > The stmmac driver use lots of pr_xxx functions to print information. > > This is bad since we cannot know which device logs the information. > > (moreover if two stmmac device are present) > [] > > So this patch replace all pr_xxx by their dev_xxx counterpart. > > Using > netdev_<level>(priv->dev, ... > instead of > dev_<level>(priv->device, > > would be more consistent with other ethernet devices. >
Ok > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c > [] > > @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ bool stmmac_eee_init(struct stmmac_priv *priv) > > */ > > spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags); > > if (priv->eee_active) { > > - pr_debug("stmmac: disable EEE\n"); > > + dev_dbg(priv->device, "disable EEE\n"); > > netdev_dbg(priv->dev, ...) > > > @@ -657,10 +657,10 @@ static int stmmac_init_ptp(struct stmmac_priv *priv) > > priv->adv_ts = 1; > > > > if (netif_msg_hw(priv) && priv->dma_cap.time_stamp) > > - pr_debug("IEEE 1588-2002 Time Stamp supported\n"); > > + dev_dbg(priv->device, "IEEE 1588-2002 Time Stamp supported\n"); > > And these netif_msg_<foo> could be > > if (priv->dma_cap.timestamp) > netif_dbg(priv, hw, priv->dev, ...); > > Thanks for the tip, I will add a patch for replacing that. Regards -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html