> On Sep 29, 2015, at 3:39 PM, Joe Stringer <joestrin...@nicira.com> wrote:
> 
> @@ -728,8 +727,14 @@ static void ovs_fragment(struct vport *vport, struct 
> sk_buff *skb, u16 mru,
>               WARN_ONCE(1, "Failed fragment ->%s: eth=%04x, MRU=%d, MTU=%d.",
>                         ovs_vport_name(vport), ntohs(ethertype), mru,
>                         vport->dev->mtu);
> -             kfree_skb(skb);
> +             goto out;
>       }
> +
> +     skb = NULL;
> +
> +out:
> +     if (skb)
> +             kfree_skb(skb);
> }
> 
> static void do_output(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb, int out_port,

Wouldn't that hunk be better as:

@@ -728,8 +727,13 @@ static void ovs_fragment(struct vport *vport, struct 
sk_buff *skb, u16 mru,
                WARN_ONCE(1, "Failed fragment ->%s: eth=%04x, MRU=%d, MTU=%d.",
                          ovs_vport_name(vport), ntohs(ethertype), mru,
                          vport->dev->mtu);
-               kfree_skb(skb);
+               goto out;
        }
+
+       return;
+
+out:
+       kfree_skb(skb);
}

static void do_output(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb, int out_port,

--
Mark Rustad, Networking Division, Intel Corporation

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to