On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:26:20AM +0000, Matt Bennett wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 14:24 +0200, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 04:08:51AM +0000, Matt Bennett wrote:
> > > Hi, I am seeing this panic occur occasionally however I am unsure how to
> > > go about reproducing it. Is it enough to simply keep creating and
> > > tearing down the PPP interface? I can also test and/or investigate this
> > > issue if a suitable reproduction method is available.
> > > 
> > There are at least two issues resulting in similar Oops.
> > 
> > The first one goes with MTU/address/link state updates on the
> > underlying interface: any such update on an interface used by a
> > PPPoE connection will generally result in an Oops when releasing the
> > PPPoE connection. This is fixed by e6740165b8f7 ("ppp: don't override
> > sk->sk_state in pppoe_flush_dev()").
> 
> Without your patch ("ppp: don't override sk->sk_state in
> pppoe_flush_dev()") I can see the following function calls being made
> when changing the mtu on the underlying ethernet interface for the PPPoE
> connection:
> 
> 1. pppoe_flush_dev() - setting PPPOX_ZOMBIE
> 
> 2. pppoe_connect - setting PPPOX_NONE (shown below)
> 
> /* Delete the old binding */
>       if (stage_session(po->pppoe_pa.sid)) {
>               pppox_unbind_sock(sk);
>               pn = pppoe_pernet(sock_net(sk));
>               delete_item(pn, po->pppoe_pa.sid,
>                           po->pppoe_pa.remote, po->pppoe_ifindex);
>               if (po->pppoe_dev) {
>                       dev_put(po->pppoe_dev);
>                       po->pppoe_dev = NULL;
>               }
> 
>               memset(sk_pppox(po) + 1, 0,
>                      sizeof(struct pppox_sock) - sizeof(struct sock));
>               sk->sk_state = PPPOX_NONE;
>       }
> 
> 3. pppoe_release - No oops (since sk->sk_state is no longer in
> {PPPOX_CONNECTED,PPPOX_BOUND,PPPOX_ZOMBIE})
> 
> It doesn't look to me like the above functions can execute
> asynchronously but I'd have to look harder. I am using 3.16 by the way.
> 
Just drop the pppoe_connect() call. Right after the pppoe_flush_dev()
call, sk_state is PPPOX_ZOMBIE and pppoe_dev is NULL. This is enouhg to
make pppoe_release() crash.

The typical scenario e6740165b8f7 ("ppp: don't override sk->sk_state in
pppoe_flush_dev()") fixes is:

  Userspace process #1:                       Userspace process #2:
  ---------------------                       ---------------------
    fd = socket(AF_PPPOX, PX_PROTO_OE, 0);
    connect(fd, {AF_PPPOX, PX_PROTO_EO,
            $sid, $mac_addr, $ifname},
            sizeof(struct sockaddr_pppox));

    ... process_packets() ...                   # ip link set $ifname mtu $mtu

    close(fd); --> Kernel Oops
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to