Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 04:51:20AM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote: >On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: >> Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 07:39:56PM CEST, j...@resnulli.us wrote: >>>Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 06:53:22PM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: >>>>> Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 07:14:39PM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: >>>>>>> Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 05:56:12AM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>>>On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: >>>>>>>>> From: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This patchset allows new rocker worlds to be easily added in future >>>>>>>>> (like eBPF >>>>>>>>> based one I have been working on). The main part of the patchset is >>>>>>>>> the OF-DPA >>>>>>>>> carve-out. It resuts in OF-DPA specific file. Clean cut. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> v1->v2: >>>>>>>>> - rtnl rocker mode change userspace expose patch was removed >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Jiri Pirko (13): >>>>>>>>> rocker: remove unused rocker_port param from alloc funcs and shorten >>>>>>>>> their names >>>>>>>>> rocker: rename rocker.h to rocker_hw.h >>>>>>>>> rocker: rename rocker.c to rocker_main.c >>>>>>>>> rocker: push tlv processing into separate files >>>>>>>>> rocker: implement set settings mode command >>>>>>>>> rocker: introduce worlds infrastructure >>>>>>>>> rocker: introduce OF-DPA world skeleton >>>>>>>>> rocker: set default world on port probe and clean world on remove >>>>>>>>> rocker: pass "learning" value as a parameter to >>>>>>>>> rocker_port_set_learning >>>>>>>>> rocker: pre-allocate wait structures during cmd ring init >>>>>>>>> rocker: remove trans parameter to rocker_cmd_exec function >>>>>>>>> rocker: call rocker_cmd_exec function with "nowait" boolean instead >>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>> flags >>>>>>>>> rocker: move OF-DPA stuff into separate file >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>A couple of my tests are failing with this patchset. A simple port >>>>>>>>test is failing and IPv4 routing test is failing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>The port test is simple: just connect a port on DUT to a port on >>>>>>>>another system and assign an IP address to each port and verify IP >>>>>>>>connectivity. I have this: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> DUT:sw1p1 (11.0.0.1/24) <-----------> host1:eth0 (11.0.0.2/24) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>The IPv4 routing tests is a bit more complicated to setup. I'm using >>>>>>>>OSPF, but I'm not seeing full routes formed in the topology, so I >>>>>>>>suspect OSPF hellos aren't getting thru. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Please fix find/fix these issues and send v3. I don't want any git >>>>>>>>bisect issues when running tests. Thanks. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I fixed that. Sending v3 in a sec. Thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>>Sorry, both tests are still broken. Would you send me your tests >>>>>>scripts so I can see why your tests are passing? >>>>> >>>>> I'm trying some smoke tests including bridge setup and just ip-ip >>>>> setup by hand. Meybe if you send me your scripts, I can run it locally. >>>> >>>>My test scripts are already included in the qemu tree. >>> >>>Okay, will rework and use your scripts. Hope I will find some time >>>during this weekend. >> >> Scott, could you try to test with current net-next? >> I'm trying basic: >> DUT:sw1p1 (11.0.0.1/24) <-----------> host1:eth0 (11.0.0.2/24) >> and it does not work for me now. It worked previously when I tested with >> my patchset. This is getting odd. > >I had just re-run the tests against net-next before submitting the >ageing_time patchset and everything passes. > >Are you using a namespace or a VM for host1? Either one should work. > >This would be a bad test, as the kernel will loop the traffic and the >offload device will not see it: > >DUT:sw1p1 (11.0.0.1/24) <-------->DUT:sw1p2(11.0.0.2/24)
For this test, I'm using 2 namespaces on baremetal. I just discovered very odd behaviour. I'm using 2 scripts so setup basic bridging scenario: On host, I use "setupns.sh": http://pastebin.com/f9igGxgV On vm, I use "setbr.sh" http://pastebin.com/Ycyyj8PK Now when I turn on the vm and do: vm# ./setbr.sh host# ./setupns.sh It works fine. But when I execute these if reverse order: host# ./setupns.sh vm# ./setbr.sh It does not work. Can you reprocude this or is it something local? (I don't understand what.) Thanks. Jiri -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html