2015-10-10 0:01 GMT-07:00 Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us>:
> Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 05:20:28AM CEST, sfel...@gmail.com wrote:
>>On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Vivien Didelot
>><vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Jiri,
>>>
>>> On Oct. Friday 09 (41) 01:54 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>>> From: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com>
>>>>
>>>> Some drivers need to implement both switchdev vlan ops and
>>>> vid_add/kill ndos. For that to work in bridge code, we need to try
>>>> switchdev op first when adding/deleting vlan id.
>>>
>>> Just curious, when would a driver need to have both operations?
>>
>>Ya, I was kind of curious of that myself. Is this because the driver
>>wants to support standalone VLANs using 802.1q module and vconfig, as
>>well as bridge vlans?  With the vlan support built into the bridge,
>>I've been working under the assumption that 802.1q module (and
>>vconfig) aren't needed, and vlans for a bridged and non-bridge port
>>can be managed using the "bridge" iproute2 cmd.
>
> Sure, but this is for standalone port device, without being bridged. In
> that case if you want to use vlan on top of that, you need these ndos.

Standalone VLAN configuration (that is, using vconfig/802.1q module)
is fairly limited, and only really makes sense, in its current
implementation for a host. By that, I mean, that we cannot configure
what is your default VLAN (the untagged one), and it does not matter
in the case of a host, because this is something that the other end:
the switch, has to have configured for you.

For netdevices from a switch device, I think we should really either
have the ability to use the same configuration flexibility as the
bridge VLAN filtering offers (setting PVID, untagged/default VLAN,
tagged), either outside of the bridge layer (which could be of limited
use), or just enforce the need of a bridge device to span these
specific ports of a switch.
-- 
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to