From: Jason Baron <jba...@akamai.com> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 00:15:59 -0400
> These patches are against mainline, I can re-base to net-next, please > let me know. > > They have been tested against: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/13/195, > which causes the use-after-free quite quickly and here: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/2/693. I'd like to understand how patches that don't even compile can be "tested"? net/unix/af_unix.c: In function ‘unix_dgram_writable’: net/unix/af_unix.c:2480:3: error: ‘other_full’ undeclared (first use in this function) net/unix/af_unix.c:2480:3: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in Could you explain how that works, I'm having a hard time understanding this? Also please address Hannes's feedback, thanks.
