On 10/12/2015 03:15 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> From: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com>
> 
> Similar to the attr usecase, the caller knows if he is holding RTNL and is
> in atomic section. So let the called to decide the correct call variant.
> 
> This allows drivers to sleep inside their ops and wait for hw to get the
> operation status. Then the status is propagated into switchdev core.
> This avoids silent errors in drivers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com>
> ---
>  include/net/switchdev.h   |   1 +
>  net/switchdev/switchdev.c | 137 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
[snip]
> +
> +struct switchdev_obj_work {
> +     struct work_struct work;
> +     struct net_device *dev;
> +     struct switchdev_obj obj;
> +     bool add; /* add of del */
s/of/or/ ? :-)

> +};
> +
> +static void switchdev_port_obj_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +     struct switchdev_obj_work *ow =
> +                     container_of(work, struct switchdev_obj_work, work);
> +     bool rtnl_locked = rtnl_is_locked();
> +     int err;
> +
> +     if (!rtnl_locked)
> +             rtnl_lock();
> +     if (ow->add)
> +             err = switchdev_port_obj_add_now(ow->dev, &ow->obj);
> +     else
> +             err = switchdev_port_obj_del_now(ow->dev, &ow->obj);
> +     if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
> +             netdev_err(ow->dev, "failed (err=%d) to %s object (id=%d)\n",
> +                        err, ow->add ? "add" : "del", ow->obj.id);
> +     if (!rtnl_locked)
> +             rtnl_unlock();
> +
> +     dev_put(ow->dev);
> +     kfree(ow);
> +}
> +
> +static int switchdev_port_obj_work_schedule(struct net_device *dev,
> +                                         const struct switchdev_obj *obj,
> +                                         bool add)
> +{
> +     struct switchdev_obj_work *ow;
> +
> +     ow = kmalloc(sizeof(*ow), GFP_ATOMIC);
> +     if (!ow)
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +     INIT_WORK(&ow->work, switchdev_port_obj_work);
> +
This can be called without rtnl, what stops the device from disappearing
between the above and the hold below ?

> +     dev_hold(dev);
> +     ow->dev = dev;
> +     memcpy(&ow->obj, obj, sizeof(ow->obj));
> +     ow->add = add;
> +
> +     queue_work(switchdev_wq, &ow->work);
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
[snip]

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to