On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Getting overflow checking right in more complicated cases is a PITA.
>
> No it is not. Not for unsigned values.
Just to clarify. The "oevrflow" test for unsigned subtracts of "a-b"
(it's really an underflow, but whatever) really is just
(b > a)
Really. That's it. Claiming that that is "complicated" and needs a
helper function is not something sane people do. A fifth-grader that
isn't good at math can understand that.
In contrast, nobody sane understands "usub_overflow(a, b, &res)".
So really. Stop making inane arguments.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
