On (11/02/15 14:57), Sowmini Varadhan wrote: > On (11/02/15 17:26), Nelson, Shannon wrote: > > > I assume you mean .1q > > > > Yes, this is what I had in mind. > > I dont think we're quite there yet, even without vlans. >
Ok finally got all the .1q stuff verified (took a bit longer than it should, because of some lab/administrative hassles in getting the vlans adjusted at intermediate switches). But the fix as I'd sent has been tested, and it is good for .1q. The issues I was seeing with promisc were orthogonal to my fix, or even to my platform - I understand those are being addressed separately. I'm probably too late for the merge window, and I dont know if this fix qualifies as "critical" for net, so I'll re-target v5 for net-next, to be conservative. --Sowmini -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
