Hi Neil,

On Nov. Tuesday 10 (46) 02:25 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> To align with the mv88e6xxx code, add a similar header file
> with all the register defines.
> The file is based on the mv88e6xxx header for coherency.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstr...@baylibre.com>

In the RFC patchset, Andrew mentioned that there is not that much things in
common with mv88e6xxx, so I don't really see a value to add a separate header
file. Would that make sense to you guys to add the defines directly in
mv88e6060.c and squash that in the last patch?

> ---
>  drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6060.h | 108 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 108 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6060.h
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6060.h b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6060.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..adbc894
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6060.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
> +/*
> + * net/dsa/mv88e6060.h - Marvell 88e6060 switch chip support
> + * Copyright (c) 2008 Marvell Semiconductor

Also I don't think the copyright notice is correct here.

Thanks,
-v
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to