Hi,

I recently saw via-velocity skb_over_panic() on one of my locations.
The panic happened with two separate hardware devices, so it appears to
be network related, not broken hardware.

I did not get the actual over_panic printk, as I got only screen shot
of them monitor. But the visible part of call trace says:
 <IRQ>
 skb_put
 velocity_poll
 net_rx_action
 __do_softirq
 irq_exit
 common_interrupt
 <EOI>

The was recurring every few hours, so I patched via-velocity with the
following after looking the code a bit:

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-velocity.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/via/via-velocity.c
@@ -2060,6 +2060,11 @@ static int velocity_receive_frame(struct velocity_info 
*vptr, int idx)
                stats->rx_length_errors++;
                return -EINVAL;
        }
+       if (pkt_len < 4 || pkt_len > vptr->rx.buf_sz) {
+               VELOCITY_PRT(MSG_LEVEL_VERBOSE, KERN_ERR " %s : the received 
frame size %d is inconsistent.\n", vptr->netdev->name, pkt_len);
+               stats->rx_length_errors++;
+               return -EINVAL;
+       }
 
        if (rd->rdesc0.RSR & RSR_MAR)
                stats->multicast++;

This seems to have fixed the panics. And I do see one of the NIC's
ethtool report's in_range_length_errors increasing once in a while. For
some reason I don't see the above debug message though, so I'm not sure
on what pkt_len triggers it.

In any case, the cade a bit later on does unconditionally:
        skb_put(skb, pkt_len - 4);

So it's possible that some bad packets make the NIC return unexpected
packet sizes, and the current code can panic on it.

Any suggestions for better fix?

Thanks,
Timo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to