On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19/11/15 04:26, Will Deacon wrote:
...
>> /me waits for on-soc tulip integration.
>
> FWIW, this already happened, the ADMtek/Infineon ADM8668 actually
> integrated a Tulip chip. I have not submitted these patches below from
> the OpenWrt tree because the chip is barely used nowadays, and it was
> only mostly popular with the Linksys WRTU54G.
>
> The patches could be made less intrusive if we did convert the pci_dma*
> calls into regular DMA-API calls, which they are nowadays, oh well!

I agree.  IIRC, there was no DMA-API when this driver was written.
James Bottomley added DMA API later and there was no need to convert
since Tulip devices were _only_ PCI at the time.

> https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/target/linux/adm8668/patches-3.18/004-tulip_pci_split.patch

In general this would be a reasonable patch to submit here with some caveats:
  1) convert to DMA API (first patch)
  2)  add CONFIG_PCI code (second patch) to handle the remaining
discovery and PCI Config space bits.

Some additional minor refactoring of the code could convert this into
a "multi-bus driver" if there is any system that could incorporate
both a platform device and a PCI device.

I expect the conversion to DMA API to be straight forward as the next
patch shows:

> https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/target/linux/adm8668/patches-3.18/005-tulip_platform.patch

Split this patch into two parts: convert to DMA-API (first patch) and
platform device support (third patch). Should be a "no brainer" to
accept.

Lastly, net/ethernet/dec/tulip driver is up for adoption. I've just
been extremely lazy about updating the MAINTAINERS entry but will
submit that shortly (apologies to Arndt for the bounced email - I know
it's a bit disconcerting to see that.)

I'm happy to continue review tulip code changes anyway.

cheers,
grant

> --
> Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to