On 11/22/15 9:35 PM, David Miller wrote:
From: David Ahern <d...@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 21:02:04 -0700
I am confused by that response given that sk_bound_dev_if is one of
the key principals for the VRF implementation. Applications wanting to
communicate over interfaces in a VRF have to set sk_bound_dev_if.
Yes, they have to set it explicitly.
You are setting it for them in response to the connection
creation, and that's what I object to.
The intent is to not require having N-listen sockets/threads/tasks to
support N-vrfs for scalability reasons. Having a special DEVICE_ANY
index adds complexity to socket lookups, so I dropped that idea long
ago. Would guarding this behavior by a sysctl be acceptable?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
