On Sun, 2015-11-29 at 23:39 +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Yuval Mintz <yuval.mi...@qlogic.com> wrote: > > [I suspect there was probably some discussion over this, > > but I couldn't find it; References would be welcome] > > there was a work by David Decotigny that should have solved the out of > bits problem here [1]. Maybe it should be revived. > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/26/882
Yes, it should. Ben. > > So it appears we're almost out of bits for new advertised speeds; > > I'm currently looking at adding 100g. > > > > Assuming we want [and we do want] to have those in the `supported', > > `advertising' and `lp_advertising' fields, the 2 reserve fields in > > ethtool_cmd would not be sufficient [unless we break them into 4 u16]. > > Or are we planning something more generic than this for future bits? > > Or. -- Ben Hutchings Who are all these weirdos? - David Bowie, reading IRC for the first time
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
