Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 09:21:37AM CET, gerlitz...@gmail.com wrote: >On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us> wrote: >> Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 06:53:35AM CET, gerlitz...@gmail.com wrote: > >>> Another question relates to users bonding/teaming netdevice ports from >>> different HW switches, or of two vlans over ports from the same HW switch. > >>> This is something that AFAIK not supported by HW -- do we want to disallow >>> that? >>> what layer in the kernel we want to enforce that limitation? team/bond >>> or switchdev core or the switchdev HW driver? > >> It is not handled at the moment. In can be easily disallowed by driver. > >what about the case of LAG + VLANs, what would be currently supported, >bonding vlans or vlan a bond? > > >bond b0 --> > vlan A.X --> switchdev port A > vlan B.X --> switchdev port B > >vlan b0.X --> bond b0 --> >vlan --> switchdev port
- vlan on top of bond/team (bridge vlan) is currently supported. - Ido is working on support of vlan device on top of bond/team. This will be most likely matter of the next patchset, quite soon. - bond/team on top of vlan is not supported by hw. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
