On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Joe Stringer <j...@ovn.org> wrote: > On 8 December 2015 at 13:23, Or Gerlitz <gerlitz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Joe Stringer <j...@ovn.org> wrote:
>>>> Apologies for the delayed response, we haven't found anything >>>> interesting yet although we've mostly looked at plain set-field >>>> actions with a combination of kernel/userspace versions. I plan to >>>> carve out some time later this week to take another look. >>> (resending due to teething issues with new email and plain-text, sorry >>> for the spam) >>> As far as the mask, I briefly discussed this with Jarno and it seems >>> like it could be something as simple as zeroing the ip_ttl mask in >>> tnl_wc_init(). >> to make sure I follow, will that have the consequence that we (user + >> kernel) will practically not be testing the ttl for these flows? > Yes, it would cause userspace to 'wildcard' the field so the kernel > flows that are installed will ignore it during lookup. Cool, any chance this is gonna fit into your schedule to meet 4.4? if not, for 4.5? Also, can the patch be made simple/small enough to go into -stable as well? Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
