On 19.12.2015 21:50, Cong Wang wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Sasha Levin <sasha.le...@oracle.com> wrote: >> Hi Hannes, >> >> I've hit the following out of bounds access while fuzzing on the latest >> -next kernel. >> >> This code was added in 3d1bec9932 ("ipv6: introduce secret_stable to >> ipv6_devconf"). >> >> [ 459.553655] BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in strlen+0x58/0x90 at addr >> ffff8802ab0efb0e >> [ 459.554953] Read of size 1 by task trinity-c91/22576 >> [ 459.555805] page:ffffea000aac3bc0 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping: >> (null) index:0x0 >> [ 459.556899] flags: 0x26fffff80000000() >> [ 459.557521] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected >> [ 459.558320] CPU: 7 PID: 22576 Comm: trinity-c91 Not tainted >> 4.4.0-rc5-next-20151218-sasha-00021-gaba8d84-dirty #2750 >> [ 459.559809] 0000000000000000 00000000549d0aa3 ffff8802ab0ef860 >> ffffffffa1042384 >> [ 459.561036] 0000000041b58ab3 ffffffffac667cdb ffffffffa10422d9 >> ffff8802ab0ef848 >> [ 459.562245] ffffffff9f6a417e 00000000549d0aa3 ffff8802ab0efb0e >> ffff8802ab0efb0e >> [ 459.563429] Call Trace: >> [ 459.563831] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:52) >> [ 459.564623] ? _atomic_dec_and_lock (lib/dump_stack.c:27) >> [ 459.565628] ? __dump_page (mm/debug.c:126) >> [ 459.566538] kasan_report_error (include/linux/kasan.h:28 >> mm/kasan/report.c:170 mm/kasan/report.c:237) >> [ 459.570997] __asan_report_load1_noabort (mm/kasan/report.c:277) >> [ 459.572119] ? check_preemption_disabled (lib/smp_processor_id.c:39) >> [ 459.573731] ? strlen (lib/string.c:481 (discriminator 1)) >> [ 459.574646] strlen (lib/string.c:481 (discriminator 1)) >> [ 459.575485] proc_dostring (kernel/sysctl.c:1825 kernel/sysctl.c:1906) >> [ 459.576445] ? alloc_debug_processing (mm/slub.c:1054) >> [ 459.577523] addrconf_sysctl_stable_secret (net/ipv6/addrconf.c:5395) > > Looks like we don't initialize the array on stack for write case. > At least other callers always initialize the data for both read > and write. > > Please try the attached patch.
Your patch is right. I am surprised you need to initialize the buffer passed down to proc_dostring so that strlen can correctly operate on it, but f4aacea2f5d1a5 ("sysctl: allow for strict write position handling") explains why. Can you submit formally? Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <han...@stressinduktion.org> Thanks, Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html