On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> wrote: >> I hate to bikeshed, but I'm not sure if "generic-mdio" is too... >> generic? Will someone writing a DT be thinking "well, this is a >> generic mdio PHY, I should set it"? "mdio-device"? >> "generic-nonphy-mdio"? Neither of those seem much better. > > How about 'not-a-phy'?
"mdio,not-a-phy" or "mdio,non-phy" will scope it a bit, especially if you expect other generic mdio properties that can do with a namespace. Probably time to add devicetree-discuss. Doing so. -Olof
