[PATCH net-next v2 10/10] tipc: use alloc_ordered_workqueue() instead of WQ_UNBOUND w/ max_active = 1

[Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan]

Until now, tipc_rcv and tipc_send workqueues in server are allocated
with parameters WQ_UNBOUND & max_active = 1.
This parameters passed to this function makes it equivalent to
alloc_ordered_workqueue(). The later form is more explicit and
can inherit future ordered_workqueue changes.

In this commit we replace alloc_workqueue() with more readable
alloc_ordered_workqueue().

Acked-by: Ying Xue <ying....@windriver.com>
Reviewed-by: Jon Maloy <jon.ma...@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan <parthasarathy.bhuvara...@ericsson.com>
---
 net/tipc/server.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/tipc/server.c b/net/tipc/server.c
index 922e04a43396..2446bfbaa309 100644
--- a/net/tipc/server.c
+++ b/net/tipc/server.c
@@ -571,13 +571,13 @@ static void tipc_work_stop(struct tipc_server *s)
 
 static int tipc_work_start(struct tipc_server *s)
 {
-       s->rcv_wq = alloc_workqueue("tipc_rcv", WQ_UNBOUND, 1);
+       s->rcv_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("tipc_rcv", 0);
        if (!s->rcv_wq) {
                pr_err("can't start tipc receive workqueue\n");
                return -ENOMEM;
        }
 
-       s->send_wq = alloc_workqueue("tipc_send", WQ_UNBOUND, 1);
+       s->send_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("tipc_send", 0);
        if (!s->send_wq) {
                pr_err("can't start tipc send workqueue\n");
                destroy_workqueue(s->rcv_wq);
-- 
2.1.4