On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 19:23 +0000, Jakub Kiciński wrote: > On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:13:15 +0000, Keller, Jacob E wrote: > > Maybe we can store it as a flag in the netdev structure instead? > > Either flag in the netdev or keep your reset callback. Neither seems > spectacularly clean. Maybe someone with a better idea will speak up > ;)
I chose a priv_flags for netdev, since I think this is better than a new ethtool op. I Cc'ed you on the new patch series if you could give it a look? I also added a few more sanity checks to ethtool_set_channels, in addition to the check for the rxfh flow table. Regards, Jake
