zhuyj <zyjzyj2...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
>I delved into the source code and Emil's tests. I think that the problem
>that this patch expects to fix occurs very unusually.
>
>Do you agree with me?
>
>If so, maybe the following patch can reduce the performance loss.
>Please comment on it. Thanks a lot.
>
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>index b7f1a99..c4c511a 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>@@ -2129,7 +2129,9 @@ static void bond_miimon_commit(struct bonding *bond)
> continue;
>
> case BOND_LINK_UP:
>- bond_update_speed_duplex(slave);
>+ if (slave->speed == SPEED_UNKNOWN)
>+ bond_update_speed_duplex(slave);
>+
> bond_set_slave_link_state(slave, BOND_LINK_UP,
>BOND_SLAVE_NOTIFY_NOW);
> slave->last_link_up = jiffies;
I don't believe the speed is necessarily SPEED_UNKNOWN coming in
here. If the race occurs at a time later than the initial enslavement,
speed may already be set (and the race manifests if the new speed
changes, i.e., the link changes from 1 Gb/sec to 10 Gb/sec), so I don't
think this is functionally correct.
Also, the call to bond_miimon_commit itself is already gated by
bond_miimon_inspect finding a link state change. The performance impact
here should be minimal.
-J
---
-Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosbu...@canonical.com
