On 16-02-25 04:46 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
On 02/25/2016 01:20 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
Let me think about it. Likely it will be subsequent patches - I just
want to get this set out first.
Yes, I mean one of the key motivation was "[...] to horizontally scale
packet processing at scope of a chasis or rack [...]".
By adding more processing points horizontally. Please read the paper;
I think we are getting to a point where this discussion is no longer
productive.
So for people
who don't have that NIC with embedded Cavium processor, they might
already hit scalability issues for encode/decode right there.
A lock on a policy that already matches is not a serious
scaling problem that you need to offload to an embedded NIC.
Do note the point here is to scale by adding more machines.
And this shit is deployed and has proven it does scale.
cheers,
jamal
