On (03/01/16 10:23), Cong Wang wrote: > > The compiler error is for fields within the union which lacks > > both a tag and a union-name. So I'm not sure how the above will > > help. > > > > Come on.. we have plenty of such anonymous unions in skbuff.h...
I realize that, even netdevice.h itself has other instances. Thus I dont understand why this one generated a compiler error for me. Thus I was wondering why others had not run into this and not suggesting it should be patched. However, changing the way we set up type etc. doesnt seem relevant to what the compiler is flagging. --Sowmini