On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Balazs Scheidler wrote: > Let me think a bit about it. For UDP packets I don't really need > conntracking sessions, I only need to translate single packets, but I'd like > to avoid messing with IP and UDP header translation myself. > > So NOTRACK is good for me, I don't need NONAT since I don't need conntrack > either. The question is how you mark an skb to avoid tracking? (an idea was > to use a flag in nfct, is it still true?)
No, I'll go with Rusty's solution: a dummy conntrack entry is used. > Is you patch available somewhere? Not yet, but real soon I'll post it :-). Regards, Jozsef - E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW-Home: http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec Address : KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary
