Eric W. Biederman <ebied...@xmission.com> wrote:
> Florian could you test and verify this patch fixes your issues?

Yes, this seems to work.

Pablo, I'm fine with this patch going into -nf/stable but I do not think
making the pointers per netns is a desireable option in the long term.

> Unlike the other possibilities that have been discussed this also
> addresses the nf_queue path as well as the nf_queue_hook_drop path.

The nf_queue path should have been fine, no?

Or putting it differently: can we start processing skbs before a netns
is fully initialized?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to