On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 10:36:57AM +0200, Laura Garcia Liebana wrote: > Add support to pass through an offset to the hash value. With this > feature, the sysadmin is able to generate a hash with a given > offset value. > > Example: > > meta mark set jhash ip saddr mod 2 seed 0xabcd sum 100 > > This option generates marks according to the source address from 100 to > 101. > > Signed-off-by: Laura Garcia Liebana <nev...@gmail.com> > --- > include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h | 2 ++ > net/netfilter/nft_hash.c | 13 +++++++++++-- > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h > b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h > index 4dbeeed..8026684 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h > @@ -764,6 +764,7 @@ enum nft_meta_keys { > * @NFTA_HASH_LEN: source data length (NLA_U32) > * @NFTA_HASH_MODULUS: modulus value (NLA_U32) > * @NFTA_HASH_SEED: seed value (NLA_U32) > + * @NFTA_HASH_SUM: Hash offset value (NLA_U32) > */ > enum nft_hash_attributes { > NFTA_HASH_UNSPEC, > @@ -772,6 +773,7 @@ enum nft_hash_attributes { > NFTA_HASH_LEN, > NFTA_HASH_MODULUS, > NFTA_HASH_SEED, > + NFTA_HASH_SUM, > __NFTA_HASH_MAX, > }; > #define NFTA_HASH_MAX (__NFTA_HASH_MAX - 1) > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_hash.c b/net/netfilter/nft_hash.c > index b7e3b40..8ab04d9 100644 > --- a/net/netfilter/nft_hash.c > +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_hash.c > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ struct nft_hash { > u8 len; > u32 modulus; > u32 seed; > + u32 sum; > }; > > static void nft_hash_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr, > @@ -35,7 +36,7 @@ static void nft_hash_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr, > > h = reciprocal_scale(jhash(data, priv->len, priv->seed), priv->modulus); > > - regs->data[priv->dreg] = h; > + regs->data[priv->dreg] = priv->sum + h; > } > > const struct nla_policy nft_hash_policy[NFTA_HASH_MAX + 1] = { > @@ -44,6 +45,7 @@ const struct nla_policy nft_hash_policy[NFTA_HASH_MAX + 1] > = { > [NFTA_HASH_LEN] = { .type = NLA_U32 }, > [NFTA_HASH_MODULUS] = { .type = NLA_U32 }, > [NFTA_HASH_SEED] = { .type = NLA_U32 }, > + [NFTA_HASH_SUM] = { .type = NLA_U32 }, > }; > > static int nft_hash_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, > @@ -60,6 +62,11 @@ static int nft_hash_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, > !tb[NFTA_HASH_MODULUS]) > return -EINVAL; > > + if (tb[NFTA_HASH_SUM]) > + priv->sum = ntohl(nla_get_be32(tb[NFTA_HASH_SUM])); > + else > + priv->sum = 0;
There is a corner case that we should reject from the kernel, I think this is: if (priv->sum + priv->modulus - 1 < priv->sum) return -EOVERFLOW; We'll handle this from userspace anyway too, but I think it's easy to reject this crazy this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html