On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 07:29:33AM +0900, Ken-ichirou MATSUZAWA wrote: > Hi, Pablo > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:48:09PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > So you want to check if the addresses mismatch, so we infer from there > > if there is NAT or not when status bits are not available. > > > > Are you trying to catch up some case in netlink event specifically? > > It's nothing. My skimping test for lnfct binding for another languate > which set only ATTR_REPL_IPV4DST then get NFCT_GOPT_IS_NAT was success, > but it fails now.
I see, we should restore the original behaviour, I think your patch is correct then. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
