On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:01:04 +0100 Michal Hocko <mho...@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Well, this is not about syzkaller, it merely pointed out a potential > > DoS... And that has to be addressed somehow. > > So how about this? > --- argh ;) > >From d48e950f1b04f234b57b9e34c363bdcfec10aeee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com> > Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:51:07 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] net/netfilter/x_tables.c: make allocation less aggressive > > syzbot has noticed that xt_alloc_table_info can allocate a lot of > memory. This is an admin only interface but an admin in a namespace > is sufficient as well. eacd86ca3b03 ("net/netfilter/x_tables.c: use > kvmalloc() in xt_alloc_table_info()") has changed the opencoded > kmalloc->vmalloc fallback into kvmalloc. It has dropped __GFP_NORETRY on > the way because vmalloc has simply never fully supported __GFP_NORETRY > semantic. This is still the case because e.g. page tables backing the > vmalloc area are hardcoded GFP_KERNEL. > > Revert back to __GFP_NORETRY as a poors man defence against excessively > large allocation request here. We will not rule out the OOM killer > completely but __GFP_NORETRY should at least stop the large request > in most cases. > > Fixes: eacd86ca3b03 ("net/netfilter/x_tables.c: use kvmalloc() in > xt_alloc_table_info()") > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com> > --- > net/netfilter/x_tables.c | 8 +++++++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c > index d8571f414208..a5f5c29bcbdc 100644 > --- a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c > +++ b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c > @@ -1003,7 +1003,13 @@ struct xt_table_info *xt_alloc_table_info(unsigned int > size) > if ((SMP_ALIGN(size) >> PAGE_SHIFT) + 2 > totalram_pages) > return NULL; offtopic: preceding comment here is "prevent them from hitting BUG() in vmalloc.c". I suspect this is ancient code and vmalloc sure as heck shouldn't go BUG with this input. And it should be using `sz' ;) So I suspect and hope that this code can be removed. If not, let's fix vmalloc! > - info = kvmalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL); > + /* > + * __GFP_NORETRY is not fully supported by kvmalloc but it should > + * work reasonably well if sz is too large and bail out rather > + * than shoot all processes down before realizing there is nothing > + * more to reclaim. > + */ > + info = kvmalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NORETRY); > if (!info) > return NULL; checkpatch sayeth networking block comments don't use an empty /* line, use /* Comment... So I'll do that and shall scoot the patch Davewards. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html