On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 01:23:04PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 12:33:38PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > Add NFT_CTX_OUTPUT_HANDLE flag and print handle that uniquely identify
> > objects from new output flags interface.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <[email protected]>
> 
> Acked-by: Phil Sutter <[email protected]>
> 
> One minor nit here as well:
> 
> [...]
> > diff --git a/doc/libnftables.adoc b/doc/libnftables.adoc
> > index c837c2d251bc..8b7aee9af134 100644
> > --- a/doc/libnftables.adoc
> > +++ b/doc/libnftables.adoc
> [...]
> > @@ -105,6 +103,8 @@ NFT_CTX_OUTPUT_SERVICE::
> >     Print port numbers as services as described in the /etc/services file.
> >  NFT_CTX_OUTPUT_STATELESS::
> >     If stateless output has been requested then stateful data is not 
> > printed. Stateful data refers to those objects that carry run-time data, 
> > eg. the *counter* statement holds packet and byte counter values, making it 
> > stateful.
> > +NFT_CTX_OUTPUT_HANDLE::
> > +   Upon insertion into the ruleset, some elements are assigned a unique 
> > handle for identification purposes. For example, when deleting a table or 
> > chain, it may be identified either by name or handle. Rules on the other 
> > hand must be deleted by handle because there is no other way to uniquely 
> > identify them. These functions allow to control whether ruleset listings 
> > should include handles or not.
> 
> s/These functions allow/This flag allows/
> 
> (Or maybe rewrite the whole last sentence to read: "This flag makes
> ruleset listings include handle values.")

I took this sentence.

> One thing to consider given the very long line above: When writing
> documentation for man pages, I've usually adhered to 80 column max
> width. Though searching for asciidoc style guides I encountered an
> interesting alternative approach, namely to keep each sentence in a
> separate line. The rationale was to clear up diffs since no reformatting
> would happen and on the other hand to easily identify overlong sentences
> one might want to break into two. I don't have a strong opinion here,
> just wanted to share an interesting idea.

I have split long line into separed lines, thanks for suggesting this.

Reply via email to