Phil Sutter <p...@nwl.cc> wrote: > This reverts commit 9b032cd6477b847f48dc8454f0e73935e9f48754. > > While it is true that a cache exists, we still need to capture new sets > and their elements if they are anonymous. This is because the name > changes and rules will refer to them by name. > > Given that there is no easy way to identify the anonymous set in cache > (kernel doesn't (and shouldn't) dump SET_ID value) to update its name, > just go with cache updates. Assuming that echo option is typically used > for single commands, there is not much cache updating happening anyway.
Acked-by: Florian Westphal <f...@strlen.de>
